Linguistic Signs On Megalithic Stone Meaning In Gomo South Nias District

Amelia Yuli Astuti; Semberiyanto Tafonao

doi:10.36057/jilp.v7i1.631

Authors

Amelia Yuli Astuti Universitas Ekasakti
Semberiyanto Tafonao Universitas Ekasakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36057/jilp.v7i1.631

Keywords:

Signifier, Signified, Denotatif, Connotative Meaning

Abstract

This research is entitled linguistic signs on meaning of megalithic stones in Orahili Gomo, South Nias. It explains the sign of the linguistic meaning of the signifier and the signified, the denotative meaning and connotative meaning of megalithic stone. It aims to describe the sequence of signifier and signified and describe the denotative and connotative meaning of megalithic stone. Based on these sources, the data were collected using the observation method and photo techniques. The analysis is carried out with semiotics, the sign of linguistic meaning and the order of the signifier method. The data were analyzed by relating it to the concept proposed by Saussure (2011) and Chandler (2002). Saussure theory is to classify signifier and signified. Chandler theory is to classify denotative and connotative meanings. Result the analysis is presented descriptively. After analyzing the data, it was found there are several specifications of the meaning of megalithic stone. This study shows that megalithic stones have high cultural significance and value, especially in Orahili Gomo. Megalithic stones have the form of signifier and signified and the meaning we can see from the shape and size of megalithic stones.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Areef, H.M. (2016). Arbitrariness: The First Principle of Linguistic Sign.

Bogdan & Taylor. (1974). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Karya.

Chandler, Daniel. (2002). Semiotics: The Basic. New York, USA: Routhledge.

De Saussure, Ferdinand. (1996). Cours de Linguistique Generale. Pengantar Linguistik Umum, (Terjemahan Rahayu S. Hidayat) Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Djajasudarma, Fatimah. T. (1993). Metode Linguistik Ancangan Metode Penelitian dan Kajian. Bandung: PT. Eresco.

Fanani, Fajriannoor. (2013). Semiotika Strukturalisme Saussure. Jurnal The Messenger, 5(1), 10-15.

Firdaus, F. (2019). Kajian Semiotika Pada Ayat Wa Maa’arsalnaaka’illa Rahmatan Lil’alamiin (Qs:Al’anbiya’:107). Jurnal Asy-Syukriyyah, 20(1), 66-85.

Haryono, Timbul. (2003). “Development and Utilization of Cultural Assets in Implementation of Regional Autonomy”, Material From the Cultural Commission at the Coordination Meeting on Cultural and Tourism, Jakarta.

Marta, R. F., & Septyana, V. (2017). Pada Brand Value Melalui Sign Brupa Layout Berita dn Iklan Ibadah Haji (Studi Komparasi Pada Harian Pos Kota Daengan Semiotika Rakyat Merdeka Pemasaran). Semiotika: Journal Komunikasi, 9(2).

Moleong, Lexy. (2005). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mudjiyanto, B., & Nur, E. (2013). Semiotics In Research Method of Communication [Semiotika Dalam Metode Penelitian Komunikasi]. Jurnal Pekommas, 16(1), 73-82.

Sari, Y. P. (2019). Makna Pesan Dakwah Dalam Lirik Lagu ‘Deen Assalam’Cover Nissa abyaSn. Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 4(2), 187.

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabet.

Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.