An Analysis of Types of Teacher's Questions in The English Learning Process in Higher Education

Authors

  • Dian Anggraini Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang
  • Noni Febriana Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang
  • Asma Alhusna Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang
  • Desi Andriani Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36057/jips.v7i3.622

Keywords:

Class Interaction, Teacher’s Questions, Teaching, Learning Process

Abstract

This research discusses the types of questions lecturers use in the teaching and learning process for the students of the University of Putra IndonesiaYPTK Padang. The aim of this research is to identify the types of questions generated by lecturers in classroom interactions. This research was carried out on students majoring in Management. In collecting data, researchers used observation and interviews. Observations are used to see the types of questions used by lecturers in the teaching and learning process. Meanwhile, interviews are used to find out why lecturers used the questions in the teaching and learning process. The researcher made observations using an observation checklist, field notes, and a video recorder as tools during the observation. Teacher questions were analyzed using the Miles and Huberman (1995) qualitative data analysis model. The research results show that in the process of learning English in Management classes, teachers predominantly use procedural and convergent types of questions to interact with students. These questions are used to determine the level of students' understanding of the material that has been taught and can help students to recall the material. Using these questions can help students participate actively by responding to these questions. Lecturers do not use divergent types of questions which can increase students' thinking patterns to be more critical in conveying ideas or opinions about something.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dian Anggraini, Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang

Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis

Noni Febriana, Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang

Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan

Asma Alhusna, Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang

Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan

Desi Andriani, Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang

Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan

References

Bloom, Benjamin S., etc. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I Cognitive Domain: New York: Longmans, Green and Co.

Chaplin, James P. 2011. Kamus Psikologi. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Elis, R. (1993). Second Language Acquisition Research and Teacher Development. The case of Teacher’s Question. Ind.Li

D. Mahoney& J Richard (eds): Exploring second Language Teacher Development Hongkong. City Polytechnic

Lightbown, P.M. & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned. (4. ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lockhard, Carles and Richard, C.Jack. (1996). Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Miles, Mattew B & Huberman, A. Michael. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Richard & Lochard. (1994). Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classroom. Cambridge: University Press

Tan, Zhi. (2007). Questioning in Chinese University EL Classroom: Regional Language Center (RELC) Journal, 38, (1) 87-102.

Tsui, A.B.M. (1995). Introduction Classroom Interaction. London: Penguin

Walsh, Steve. (2006). Investigating Classroom Discourse. London: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-01

How to Cite

Anggraini, D., Febriana, N., Alhusna, A., & Andriani, D. (2023). An Analysis of Types of Teacher’s Questions in The English Learning Process in Higher Education. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Scholastic, 7(3), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.36057/jips.v7i3.622

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.