The Analysis of Politeness Strategies in Directive Utterance as Found Among English Department Students at Dharma Andalas University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36057/jilp.v5i2.539Keywords:
Politeness, Indicators, English Department, StudentsAbstract
This research describe and explain the indicators of politeness among students of English Department in Dharma Andalas University. This research uses descriptive qualitative analysis. The data of this research are the speech between English Department students. Retrieval of data using the refer method. This method is followed by a free and interactive technique. Data was collected by taking recorded conversations between students of English Department at Dharma Andalas University. The results of the research data show 5 indicators that students apply in their utterances, they are: the use of word help, sorry, greeting, could, and thank you. The use of greeting is the most indicator that the students used in their utterances, followed by the use of word help, could, sorry and the last one is 4 data of indicator that uses of word thank you.
Downloads
References
[2]Crowley, Terry. 2007. Field Linguistic: A Beginner’s Guide. New York: Oxford University Press.
[3]Cruse, A. 2006. A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press.
[4]Duranti, A. 2002. Linguistic Anthropology. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
[5]Glaser, K. 2009. Acquiring Pragmatic Competence in a foreign language mastering preferred speech acts. Chemnitz University of Technology.
[6]Goody, E. 1978. Questions and Politeness: strategies in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[7]Kramsch, C. 1998. Language and Culture. Oxford University Press.
[8]Lakoff, R. 1972. Language in Context. Linguistic Society of America, 48(4), 927.
[9]Leech, Geoffery. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman. mastering preferred speech acts. Chemnitz University of Technology.
[10]Navratilova, Olga. 2005. Politeness Strategies in Institutional Speech Acts. Retrieve January 20,2013. From journal Discourse and interaction 1.
[11]Nida, Eugene. 1970. Morphology: The Descriptive Analysis of Words. The University of Michigan Press
[12]Revita, Ike. 2009. “Faktor-faktor penanda kesantunan dalam permintaan berbahasa minang kabau (kajian Pragmatik)” dalam jurnal Bahasa Januari-April 2009. Brunei Darusallam: Syariat Perniagaan dan Perhidmatan percetakan Sdn.
[13]SALIFU, Alhassan Nantogma 2010. Signaling Politeness, Power and Solidarity: Style in though Terms of Address in Dagbanli. Ghana: University for Development Studies.
[14]Senowarsito. 2013. Politeness Strategies in teacher-student interaction in an ELF Classroom. Malang: English Department, Faculty of Letters State University of Malang.
[15]Surdaryanto. 1993. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana.
[16]Trosbrog, Anna. 1995. Interlanguage Pragmatics: Request, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
[17]Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[18]Yuka, Akutsu. 2009. Positive Politeness Strategies in Oral Communication I Textbooks. Retrieved January 20, 2013. From The Economic Journal of Takasaki City University of Economics vol.52 No.1 2009 pp.59-70.
[19]Yule, George. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
