A Discourse Analysis of Hegemonic Masculinity on TV Advertisements

Authors

  • Amelia Yuli Astuti Universitas Ekasakti
  • Annisa Idafini Ardi Fakultas Sastra Universitas Ekasakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36057/jilp.v2i1.330

Keywords:

Cohesion, Context, Coherence, Masculinity, Hegemonic Masculinity

Abstract

This research entitled “A Discourse Analysis of Hegemonic Masculinity on TV Advertisements” aims to identify cohesion, context and coherence when research the hegemonic masculinity on TV advertisement, identify representations of  masculinity on TV advertisement, and analyze hegemonic masculinity realized on TV advertisement.
This research uses discourse analysis approach. Where, the researcher used descriptive research method, which aims to create descriptions, as well as describe the data naturally from TV advertisement about hegemonic masculinity. And in collecting data researcher use techniques see, hear and record, then classified and analyzed.
In this research found 5 of  5 categories by Halliday and Hasan (1976) are:  reference, substitution, ellipsis, conjunction and lexical cohesion. Then 8 categories of context in advertisement according to Cook (1992) are: substance, music and picture, paralanguage, situation, a joint text, intertext, participants. Furthermore according to Reinhart (1980) that coherence is categorized into 3 categories namely: connectedness, consistency and relevant. Finally,the discovery of masculinity and hegemonic masculinity based on the concept of Connel (1995) on TV advertisement. Based on the results of this research, researcher concluded that the advertisement on TV, which where the advertisement of  male products on TV contained full of messages in the form of hegemonic masculinity in it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Amelia Yuli Astuti, Universitas Ekasakti

Fakultas Sastra

Downloads

Published

2018-12-30

How to Cite

Astuti, A. Y., & Ardi, A. I. (2018). A Discourse Analysis of Hegemonic Masculinity on TV Advertisements. Jurnal Ilmiah Langue and Parole, 2(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.36057/jilp.v2i1.330

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.