The Comparison Between Lubuk Gadang  and Pasir Talang Dialect in South Solok

Mac Aditiawarman; Sri Wahyuningsih

doi:10.36057/jips.v9i3.778

Authors

Mac Aditiawarman Universitas Ekasakti
Sri Wahyuningsih Universitas Ekasakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36057/jips.v9i3.778

Keywords:

Dialect, Lexical, Morphology, Lubuk Gadang, Pasir Talang

Abstract

This research entitled the Comparison Between Lubuk Gadang and Pasir Talang Dialects in South Solok.The main objective of this research is to compare the dialects of Lubuk Gadang and Pasir Talang, both of which originate from the South Solok region. The research focuses on lexical similarities, lexical differences, and word formation processes within the two dialects. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed, with data collected through direct interviews, observation, note-taking, and audio recordings. This research is grounded in lexical theory, dialectology, and morphological theory. These frameworks were used to analyze the vocabulary of both dialects in order to identify similarities and differences, as well as to understand the word formation processes involved. The results of the analysis revealed that there are 692 lexical items that share similarities between the two dialects, while 92 lexical items exhibit form differences. Additionally, 73 vocabulary items were identified as having different forms but the same meanings. In terms of word formation, several morphological processes were found in both dialects, including borrowing 13 items, compounding 21 items, clipping 3 items, acronym 1 item, and derivation 12 items. These findings highlight the linguistic diversity and complexity within regional dialects in South Solok.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1]Anjelia, T., and Rosa, R. N. (2019). Dialectal Comparison Between Simarasok Sub-Dialect and Padang Tarok Sub-Dialect: the Lexical Variation. English Language and Literature, 8(3) https://doi.org/10.24036/ELL.V813.105774

[2]Boberg, C., John, N and Dominic, W (2018). The Handbook of Dialectology. Oxford: Editional Office.

[3]Chambers, J. K., and Trudgill, P. (2004). Dialectology. Second Edition: Cambridge University Press.

[4]Francis, W. Nelson. (1983). Dialectology: An Introduction : Longman

[5]Khothari, Chandra Raj. (2004). Research Methodology. Methods and Techniques. : New Age International Publisher.

[6]Lieber, Richolle (2010). Introducing Morphology : Cambridge University Press.

[7]Miles, B. M,. A, Michael H,. and Jhonny , S. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebooks. Third Edition : Sage Publication.

[8]Mujahidaturrahmah, F., and Saun, S. (2018). The Lexical Comparison Between Tebing Tinggi Sub-Dialect in Dharmasraya and the Standard Minangkabaunese. English Language and Literature. 7(1).,82-91. https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v7i1.1553560

[8]Murphy, M. lynne. (2010). Lexical Meaning. : Cambridge University Press.

[9]Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., and DeVault, M. L. (2016). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A guidebook and Resource. Fourth Edition : John Wiley and Sons.

[10]Wansyah, Z. A., and Jufrizal, J. (2023). The Lexical Comparison Between Tanjung Bonai Aur Sub Dialect in Sijunjung and Standard Minangkabauense. English Language and Literature,12(1).,40-48. https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v12i1.119606

[11]Yandra, and Refnaldi. (2013). A Study of Lexical Comparison Between Labuah Subdialect of Minangkabu standard Minangkabauense. Journal of English Departement of FBS Universitas Negri Padang. https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v8i4.106702

[12]Yule, Georgie (2010). The Study Of Language. Third Edition : Cambridge University Press.