Linguistic Signs of The Symbolic Meaning in Tabuik Pariaman West Sumatra

Amelia Yuli Astuti; Suci Rahmadani

doi:10.36057/jips.v7i3.639

Authors

Amelia Yuli Astuti Universitas Ekasakti
Suci Rahmadani Universitas Ekasakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36057/jips.v7i3.639

Keywords:

Signified and Signifier Meaning, Denotative and Connotative Meaning

Abstract

This research is entitled linguistic on the meaning of tabuik symboik in Pariaman, West Sumatra. It explains the sign of the linguistic meaning of pen and Omen, denotative and connotative meaning on Tabuic symbols. It aims to improve the order of pens and signs and enhance the denotative and connotative meanings in Tabuic symbols. Based on these sources, the data were collected by observation method with interview and photo techniques. The analysis is carried out by semiotics, signs of linguistic meaning and the sequence of presentation methods. The Data were analyzed by associating them with concepts discovered by Chandler (2007).Saussure's theory was to classify the pen and the mark.Chandler's theory is to classify denotative and connotative meanings. The analysis results are presented descriptively. After analyzing the data, it was found that there are several specifications of the meaning of the Tabuik symbol. This research shows that the Tabuik symbol has a high cultural and religious meaning and value, especially in Pariaman . Tabuik has the form of a sign and a sign and the meaning we can see from the form and symbol of Tabuik.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Amelia Yuli Astuti, Universitas Ekasakti

Fakultas Sastra

References

Berger, A.A (2010). The Objects of Affection Semiotic and Consumer Cultur. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Chandler, Daniel. (2007). Semiotics: The Basic. New York, USA: Routhledge.

Dalmenda, Elian novi. (2017). Makna tradisi tabuik oleh masyarakat kota pariaman (studi deskriptif interaksionisme simbolik). Jurnal antropologi : isu isusocial budaya, Vol.18 :135-151. desember 2017

Djajasudarma,Fatimah.T.(2006).MetodeLinguistikAncanganMetodePenelitiandanKajian. Bandung: PT. Eresco.

Manullang E. B & Windy Lizasadela (2021)TheSemiotic Meaning in Lapo Batak Ornaments in Kuala Tanjung, Batubara Regency.Jurnal Darma Agung Vol: 29(2) Agustus 2021, 235-249.

Moleong, Lexy. (2005). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muchtar, Asril, dkk. (2014). Sejarah Tabuik. Pariaman : Dinas Kebudayaan dan PariwisataKota Pariaman.

Nugraha S. N.,andAzka S. H. (2021). Social Stigma of Covid-19: asemiotic analysis of whocampaign posters. journal of social sciences and humanities. Vol:11(2), 2021.

Nugrahani, Farida. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Surakarta.

PrasojowatMalikatin Wahyu, M. Natsir and Setya Ariani. (2019). A Semiotic Analysis Foundonthe Cigarette Products.Jurnal Ilmu Budaya Vol: 3(1) Januari 2019, 86-91.

Samsu. (2017). Metode Penelitian (Teori dan Aplikasi Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, Mixed Methods, Serta Research & Development). (Rusmini, Ed.) Jambi, Indonesia: Pusat Studi Agama dan Kemasyarakatan ( PUSAKA).

Silverman, Hug J. (1998). Cultural Semiosis Tracing the Signifier. Routledge : New york and London

Saifuddin,Fahimah. (2018).Denotative and Connotative meaning of signs in Lombok Musical Instrument (Gendang beleq).Internatitional Journal of English Literature and social Sciences (IJELS). Vol 3(1), Jan-feb,2018, 97-99.

Trisnayanti, N. M. D., Pratiwi, D. P. E., & Candra, K. D. P. (2021). Discovering Hidden Messages in Covid-19 Advertisement “Stay Home Save Lives”: A Semiotic Analysis.Retorika: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa,Vol: 7(1), 25-31