FBI Criminal Investigation Procedures On Finding A Missing Person In Gillian Flynn’s Gone Girl

Andy Amirudin; Wedi Rahmad Amran

doi:10.36057/jips.v9i3.780

Authors

Andy Amirudin Universitas Ekasakti
Wedi Rahmad Amran Universitas Ekasakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36057/jips.v9i3.780

Keywords:

Criminal Evidence, Missing Person Investigation, Criminal Motives, Gone Girl

Abstract

The research entitled FBI Criminal Investigation Procedures on Finding a Missing Person in Gillian Flynn’s Gone Girl examines how the novel depicts the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s methods in solving Amy Dunne’s disappearance. The study explores how the narrative reflects real investigative practices, particularly regarding criminal evidence, missing person procedures, and underlying motives. The background emphasizes the role of crime fiction in shaping public views of law enforcement, while the purpose is to analyze the representation of FBI methods and assess their effectiveness in uncovering the mystery. This study uses a qualitative, descriptive-analytical approach, with Gone Girl as the primary text. Theories of criminal investigation, criminology, and narrative analysis support the interpretation. Data analysis involves categorizing textual evidence, identifying investigative patterns, and interpreting them through forensic and motive-based perspectives. The findings show that the novel illustrates the complexity of FBI missing person cases, highlighting physical and psychological evidence, systematic investigative steps, and the impact of hidden motives. Flynn blends authentic procedures with fictional exaggeration, enhancing narrative tension while emphasizing motive as central to crime. The portrayal reveals both the strengths and limitations of law enforcement in handling such cases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Andy Amirudin, Universitas Ekasakti

Fakulty of Literature

References

[1]Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

[2]Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

[3]Campbell, W. K., & Miller, J. D. (Eds.). (2011). The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments. Wiley.

[4]Canter, D. V. (2004). Offender profiling and investigative psychology. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 1(1), 1–15.

[5]Cavender, G., & Jurik, N. C. (2012). Justice and crime in the media. Waveland Press.

[6]Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

[7]Daly, K., & Koutsou, D. (2018). The criminal justice system and missing persons investigations. Routledge.

[8]Flynn, G. (2012). Gone girl. Crown Publishing Group.

[9]Gill, R. (2015). The cultural politics of the ‘girl’ in crisis: Violence, victimization and agency in female-centred crime fiction. Feminist Media Studies, 15(3), 482–497.

[10]Holmes, R. M., & Holmes, S. T. (2010). Serial murder (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

[11]Kocsis, R. N. (2003). Criminal psychological profiling: Validities and abilities. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47(2), 126–144.

[12]Kocsis, R. N. (2013). Criminal psychology: A guide to criminal profiling. Academic Press.

[13]Meyer, J. (2015). The investigation of missing persons: A comprehensive overview. Criminal Justice Review, 40(4), 327–345.

[14]Pinizzotto, A. J., & Finkel, N. J. (1990). Criminal personality profiling: An outcome and process study. Law and Human Behavior, 14(3), 215–233.

[15]Stern, V. (2014). Missing persons: Psychological and investigative strategies. Oxford University Press.

[16]Turvey, B. E. (2011). Criminal profiling: An introduction to behavioral evidence analysis (4th ed.). Academic Press.

[17] Walters, G. D. (2006). Psychopathy and crime: Testing the incremental validity of PCL-R-measured psychopathy. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33(2), 185–203.