The Implication of Teachers’ Politeness Strategy In Teaching on Higher Institution

Authors

  • Dian Anggraini Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang
  • Ryan Hidayat Rafiola Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Vivi Nila Sari Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang
  • Desi Andriani Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36057/jilp.v6i1.551

Keywords:

Politeness Strategy, Interaction Class, Pedagogical Function

Abstract

This research aims to explain the types of politeness strategies used by teachers and students in class interactions, how these strategies are manifested in actions in class interactions and pedagogical functions of politeness strategies. The subjects in this study are teachers and students who used politeness strategies as many as 52 students and one teacher in the learning and teaching process. The research is a qualitative research. Data collected through observation and interviews. The results showed that is used by students to talk to the teacher when the meaning of speech is conveyed implicitly. There are four pedagogic functions in politeness strategies, namely giving the distance between teacher and students, atmosphere in class, reducing student tension, and making social interaction between teacher and students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dian Anggraini, Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang

Managemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis

Ryan Hidayat Rafiola, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan

Vivi Nila Sari, Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang

Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis

Desi Andriani, Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang

Fakultas Keguruan Ilmu Pendidikan

References

[1]Gamble, Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage, 2005.
[2]C. M. & M. E. O, Discourse and Context in Language Teaching. New York: Combridge University Press, 2000.
[3]J. Syrova, Politeness Markers in Spoken Language. Brno: Masaryk University Brno, 2013.
[4]M. Morris, “An International to the Philosophy of Language.,” Cambridge New York Univ. Press., 2007.
[5]I. K. Seken, “Kesatunan Linguistik dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Kedua.,” Naskah Orasi Pengenalan Jab. Guru Besar Tetap Dalam Bid. Pendidik. Bhs. Inggris, Fak. Bhs. dan SEni, Univ. Pendidik. Ganesha Singaraja, 28 Sept. 2017, 2007.
[6]S. Mills, “Gender and politeness.,” Cambridge Cambridge Univ. Press., 2003.
[7]F. Sita, “Realization Politeness Strategies IN EFL Class In Academic Year 2015/2016.,” Retrieved digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/ abstrak/53566/Realization -of-Politeness-Strategy-inTeacher-Students-EFLClassroom-Interaction-APragmatic-Study-in-SMPMuhammadiyah-7Semarang-in-AcademicYear-Of-20152016 May 1, 2017, 2016.
[8]L. Peng, L., Xie, F., & Cai, “A Case Study of College Teacher â€TM s Politeness Strategy in EFL Classroom, 4(1), 110– 11t5.,” htps://doi.org/10.4304/tpls. 4.1.110-115, 2014.
[9]M. Dagarin, “Classroom Interaction and Communication Strategies in Learning English as a Foreign.,” . Ljubljana Birografika Bori Ljunljana., 2004.
[10]A. L. Hobjila, A., & Cuza, “Positive Politeness and Negative Politeness in Didactic Communication.,” Soc. Behav. Sci. 63 213-222., 2012.
[11]T. Dornyei, Z. & Murphey, Group Dynamics in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., 2003.
[12]N. Bloome, D., Carter, S. P., Christian, B. M. Otto, S. & Shuart-Faris, “Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A micro ethnographic perspective.,” Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum., 2005.
[13]G. Mugford, “That’s Not Very Polite! Discursive Struggle and Situated Politeness in the Mexican Englishlanguage Classroom. In B. L Davies, M. Haugh & A. J. Merrison (Eds), Situated Politeness(pp.53-72).,” London Contin. Int., 2011.
[14]N. P. S. E. Carniasih, “The politeness at English Classroom Interaction and Its Implications Toward English Teaching-Learning in Wearness Education Center Bali.,” Denpasar Udayana Univ., 2011.
[15]P. A. dan R. Yulia singgih D Gunarsa, “Psikologi Anak Dan Remaja,” J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2016.
[16]F. Sholichah, “Politeness in Requesting and Refusing Teacher’s Instruction in English Teaching Learning,” STAIN Salatiga, 2012.
[17]G. Yule, “Pragmatics.,” Cambridge Oxford Univ. Press. Retrieved from hhtps//www.google.co.id/ url?sa=t&sorce=web&cd=, 1996.
[18]S. C. Brown, P., & Levinson, “Politeness : some universals in language usage.,” Cambridge Univ. Press., 1987.
[19]I. N. A. J. Putra, “Profil Bahasa Bali Masyarakat Tutur Muslim Pegayaman dan Implikasi Pengajarannya di Sekolah.,” J. Pendidik. dan Pengajaran 1, 7-14. Retrieved from https//ejournal.undiksha.a c.id/index/php/JPP/article/ view/1722., 2009.
[20]A. Trosborg, “Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies.,” Berlin Mout. Gruyter., 1994.
[21]A. Wray, Allison., Trott, Kate., and Bloomer, Project in Linguistics;A Practical Guide to Research Language. London: Edward Arnold, 2001.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-01

How to Cite

Anggraini, D., Rafiola, R. H., Sari, V. N., & Andriani, D. (2022). The Implication of Teachers’ Politeness Strategy In Teaching on Higher Institution. Jurnal Ilmiah Langue and Parole, 6(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.36057/jilp.v6i1.551